تاریخ فلسفه اسلامی

تاریخ فلسفه اسلامی

A Critical Analysis of the Neo-Sadrianism: Epistemological Challenges and Future Prospects

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
Hamedah Rastaei
Assistant Professor of the Philosophy Department of the Institute of Higher Education Al Taha
10.22034/hpi.2026.568528.1193
چکیده
The Neo-Sadrianism, as the dominant school of contemporary Islamic philosophy, has played a decisive role in the education and research of Islamic philosophy and rational theology. Relying on the heritage of Transcendental Wisdom (al-Hikmat al-Muta‘aliyah) and its rereading by thinkers such as Allameh Tabataba’i, Ayatollah Javadi Amoli, and Ayatollah Mesbah Yazdi, this movement has attempted to reconstruct philosophical reason in the face of Modernity and contemporary atheistic challenges. Adopting an analytical-critical approach, the present article engages in a constructive internal evaluation of this movement; a judgment that aims not to negate its achievements, but to identify structural challenges and outline its future prospects. Finally, by mapping future scenarios, the article emphasizes the necessity of methodological rethinking, critical dialogue with rivals both within and outside the tradition, and a deeper engagement of philosophy with the issues facing contemporary humanity.Finally, by mapping future scenarios, the article emphasizes the necessity of methodological rethinking, critical dialogue with rivals both within and outside the tradition, and a deeper engagement of philosophy with the issues facing contemporary humanity.
کلیدواژه‌ها
Islamic Philosophy
Neo-Sadrianism
Allameh Tabataba’i
Qur’anic Exegesis
Epistemology
Methodology
موضوعات
1.    Aboudiat, A. (2003). “Do We Have Islamic Philosophy?”. Ma’rifat-e Falsafi, 1(1-2).
2.    Aboudiat, A. (2006). Introduction to the System of Sadrian Wisdom. Tehran: SAMT & Imam Khomeini Institute.
3.    Ebrahimi Dinani, G. (2002). Porseman Magazine, (6).
4.    Eslami, S. H. (2005). “A Comparison of Philosophy Teaching Texts in the West and Iran”. In Proceedings of the Conference on Reviewing Texts…, Tehran: IHCS.
5.    Fa’ali, M. T. (1997). Sensory Perception from Avicenna’s Perspective. Qom: Islamic Propagation Office.
6.    Farati, A. (2016). Political Intellectual Typology of Qom Seminary. Tehran: IICT.
7.    Gharavi Isfahani, M. H. (1994). Buhuth fi al-Usul. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
8.    Javadi Amoli, A. (1994). Shari’at in the Mirror of Knowledge. Qom: Esra.
9.    Javadi Amoli, A. (1999). Tasnim. Vol. 1. Qom: Esra.
10. Khomeini, S. R. (1410 AH). Tal’iqat 'ala Sharh Fusus al-Hikam. Qom: Pasdar-e Islam.
11. Majlisi, M. B. (1403 AH). Bihar al-Anwar. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi.
12. Maleki Mianji, M. B. (1414 AH). Tafsir Manahij al-Bayan. Tehran: Ministry of Guidance.
13. Mesbah Yazdi, M. T., & Fayyazi, G. (2006). “Philosophy and Religion Roundtable”. Ma’rifat-e Falsafi, (11).
14. Motahhari, M. (1984). Ten Discourses. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
15. Motahhari, M. (1997). Divine Justice. Tehran: Sadra.
16. Sabzwari, M. H. (1416 AH). Sharh al-Manzumah. Qom: Nab.
17. Shariati, A. (2010). Collected Works. Vol. 4. Tehran: Elham.
18. Shirazi, S. M. (Mulla Sadra). Sharh Usul al-Kafi. Lithograph.
19. Tabataba’i, S. M. H. (1417 AH). Al-Mizan fi Tafsir al-Qur’an. Qom: Islamic Publications Office.
20. Tabataba’i, S. M. H. (1420 AH). Nihayat al-Hikmah. Qom: Islamic Publishing Institute.
 
تاریخ فلسفه اسلامی
دوره 5، شماره 17
بهار 1405
صفحه 59-70

  • تاریخ دریافت 03 دی 1404
  • تاریخ بازنگری 12 بهمن 1404
  • تاریخ پذیرش 14 بهمن 1404